Most of you have probably heard something about game theory, a topic some poker players have gotten curious about and studied. If you're one of those players, you might also have heard of 'Nash equilibrium,' which is a concept that comes out of game theory.
'Nash equilibrum' is named after a mathematician named John Forbes Nash, Jr. who came up with the idea during the middle of the 20th century. Here is a definition:
'If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing strategies while the other players keep theirs unchanged, then the current set of strategy choices and the corresponding payoffs constitute a Nash equilibrium.'
Jarrett Nash poker results, stats, photos, videos, news, magazine columns, blogs, Twitter, and more. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for SlowPlay 'Nash' Poker Chip Set 500 count, metal slug composite heavy 14g NEW at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products! Poker Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for serious players and enthusiasts of poker. Nash Equilibrium is where two players don't have an incentive to. In this article pro poker player MikeyMcD45 defines 'Nash Equilibrium' – a complex and often misunderstood topic in poker, and explains the benefits of the advanced Nash Equilibrium calculator function in ICMIZER whilst highlighting some of the limitations of Nash Equilibrium and important things to keep in mind. Willy wonka slots promo code.
Nash proved that if we allow mixed strategies, then every game with a finite number of players in which each player can choose from finitely many pure strategies has at least one Nash equilibrium. Do you follow? That means within any game if there are a finite number of strategies available, there's at least one combination where the strategies chosen will create a Nash equilibrium.
If you think about it, that means that every poker situation and poker in general has its own Nash equilibrium. In theory, if everyone plays perfectly, even no-limit hold'em is a solved game.
Should we start panicking? No, not yet.
First of all, there is a huge difference between knowing there is a Nash equilibrium and finding one. Right now we are able to find Nash equilibriums only in the easiest spots in NLHE -- say in a heads-up 'pushbot' (all in or fold) game, or when looking specifically at our river bet-call strategy. But it's getting too complicated if we try to do it in a harder spot -- indeed, in most spots.
Let's look at a small example.
We are playing three-handed, and only two players make the money. The blinds are 120/240. One player has 3,000 chips, we have 2,000, and a third player has just one chip.
The guy with one chip is on the button and he folds. We are in the small blind. Nash equilibrium here would be to push ~13% for us and the big blind to call ~7.5%. Ranges are that tight, because you don't want to bust out before the one-chip guy. But let's say guy in the big blind is a huge fish who would call us with -suited and hands like that. That move is very unprofitable for him, but it's also very unprofitable for us -- to the point where our push becomes very, very negative EV.
The winner in this situation? That guy with one chip who folded. He is getting tons of value despite having just one chip and folding first to act.
As this example shows, using the range from Nash equilibrium does not guarantee you profit or even to break even. That's the most widespread misconception about 'GTO' or game theory optimal play -- that there exists an 'ideal' strategy that guarantees you at least breaking even, no matter how your opponents play. As we've seen that's not the case, because Nash equilibrium only works if everyone is playing perfectly. In fact, if someone is not playing perfectly and making mistakes, that can affect you in a negative way.
So don't worry.. :) Poker will always be the game we love, a game where you constantly have to adapt to what others do. A game in which no 'secret math strategy that beats everything' exists.